The Just Anger

I am a businessman and one thing I can tell you about it that you can’t afford of be angry and you want your customers angry with whatever are you selling. My point? We will see

Although almost all the religions in the world press for fact that the world exist because someone with supreme power want it to exist. Also, the destruction of the world will also be called by the same God. Moreover, it is also to be taken into account that same religions also say that god or a part of God resides in us as well.

The fact that is accepted almost all the religions is that nothing goes without the wish or permission of God.

Metaphorically asking will you kill your own child? If yes then I think God’s anger is Just.

Now coming to the main point The Just (right) Anger.

Anger is the basic instinct of human nature, and it brings aggression into expression in a rather cruel way. With the advances of race and society we can say that the form in which anger is expressed has changed considerably, we are more subtle in expressing anger on a generalized scale, or on the other side we have seen act of anger in which a single entity or person has done severe damage, which was considered impossible back in 1900.

The justification of anger is a thing which is as abstract as modern art. You can derive your own conclusion and it may only be partially right. Even right Questions look like wrong when referenced to a special circumstances, there is no universal guidelines.

And this is what I am trying to convince. That there is no justification of Actions done under the influence of Anger.

All of us face the time when our impulse ask us to take action, which can have drastic result in our life. But consider this in most of our movies (if we assume that movies reflect the generalized mood of cinema) reflect that hero actually fight villain when he is very angry.

Does that anger falls under the category of Just? Because someone hurt you and you retaliate and beat that person in return will that anger qualify for Just Anger?

The Govt. when face the Tremendous task of showing patience in front of a agitation, fails and use force against its own people. They argue that this is affecting the bigger population. But here the question remains the same. Does this anger qualify for Just (right) Anger?

In fact the action of State as an Authorized killer in the name of the justice can’t be called justice when the state itself calls that it act upon the path set by someone who had followed the path of God.

The Example of whole Muslim world and Vatican and Bible following world is an example.

Moreover the offence of one man can be the act of urgency to another man, even it can be act of self-defense, or act done in unstable state of mind. As we all know Anger is the state when person is not really oneself. And no matter what happens that anger can’t be Just (right) anger universally.

All the above instance prove that when human evolved into some complex society- city- dwelling creature, the emotional fabric which hold us is so flexible that it covers all the actions and the irony is the appearance of this fabric i.e. emotions is such that we feel that there is no emotions left in someone while that person is simply acting on his own anger (which can be expressive in the form of hatred)

I can say there is No Just anger ( as opposite to most religions which says that the world will be doomed by apocalypse as we are sinner and God will destroy the world as a result of overloading of sins)

Even God can’t explain the Justification of anger itself.  

Once again if you are enlighten by this reading that’s really awesome, otherwise you can read some good book by some really good writer! Good luck to that.

Your comments are welcome